Current viral infection tests tend to plod along well-worn paths, looking up just a few common viruses. A new kind of viral infection test, however, can deliver results quickly, and it can scrutinize markers that are common to many viruses. The new test, which measures cellular RNA and protein, has been shown to accurately identify viral infection as a cause of respiratory symptoms.
Should such a test find its way to physicians’ offices, it could help reduce the misuse of antibiotics to treat viral infections. And should it be used to evaluate samples from nasal swabs, as it has already been used in experimental tests that evaluated upper respiratory infections, it could be particularly helpful in evaluating very sick patients or young children.
The new test was developed by Yale School of Medicine researchers, Marie L. Landry, M.D., and Ellen Foxman, M.D., Ph.D. According to Dr. Foxman, an assistant professor of laboratory medicine, the new test is a simpler and more cost-effective way of looking at viral infection.
To identify biomarkers of viral infection applicable to many different respiratory viruses, Drs. Foxman and Landry first tested human nasal cells in the laboratory. Using genetic sequencing techniques, they screened the cells for RNAs and proteins that increase when a virus is present.
Drs. Foxman and Landry identified three RNAs and two proteins that are “turned on” by a virus. Guided by these findings, the researchers conducted two studies. One study prospectively examined the performance of a signature of three host mRNAs for predicting viral infection. The other study prospectively evaluated the CXCL10 and CXCL11 proteins. Like the RNA markers, these proteins are known to be associated with the antiviral interferon response.
The results of this work appeared December 21 in The Journal of Infectious Diseases, in an article entitled, “Antiviral Response in the Nasopharynx Identifies Patients with Respiratory Virus Infection.” According to this study, the new test indicates great potential for developing simple, pan-viral tests to identify patients with respiratory virus infection.
“Our first study showed that a signature of three mRNAs, CXCL10, IFIT2, and OASL, predicted respiratory virus detection with an accuracy of 97%, and identified proteins correlating with virus detection,” wrote the article’s authors. “In a second study, elevated CXCL11 or CXCL10 protein levels identified samples containing respiratory viruses, including viruses not on the initial test panel.”
The researchers hope to develop their new method into a rapid gene or protein test that doctors could perform in their offices. Such a test could help providers diagnose a viral infection more quickly and accurately than with routine evaluation or more time-consuming and expensive tests, the researchers said.
“Instead of looking for individual viruses,” said Dr. Foxman, “our test asks the question: 'Is the body fighting a virus?' We found we can answer that question very well.”
“One reason to test is to know why the patient is sick,” added Dr. Foxman. “The other reason is to make a decision about whether people who are not that sick should get antibiotics.”
Dr. Foxman noted that the research team's goal is to create a gene- or protein-based test available for general use within one to five years.