Mosquito-borne viruses have proven to be particularly insidious, with dengue easily ranking as one of the worst offenders. Moreover, developing a viable vaccine against dengue virus has been especially challenging because the pathogen is actually four different serotypes. Without protection against all four, a vaccine can wind up doing more harm than good. To help vaccine developers overcome this hurdle, researchers at the UNC School of Medicine investigated samples from children enrolled in a dengue vaccine trial to identify the specific kinds of antibody responses that correlate with protection against dengue virus disease. Findings from the new study were published recently in the Journal of Clinical Investigation through an article entitled “Dengue vaccine breakthrough infections reveal properties of neutralizing antibodies linked to protection.”

Interestingly, the research team discovered that a small subpopulation of antibodies binding to unique sites on each serotype is linked to protection. The scientists are confident that their findings will provide important information for vaccine developers to consider when creating a dengue vaccine, which has long eluded scientists.

The four dengue virus serotypes are mosquito-borne flaviviruses that infect hundreds of millions of individuals each year in Southeast Asia, western Pacific Islands, Africa, and Latin America. Nearly 100 million individuals report flu-like symptoms. Though rarely deadly, the virus can cause severe illness, especially when a person who was previously infected with one serotype (and recovers) is then infected by a second serotype. This happens because antibodies from the first infection help the virus replicate during the second infection through a process called antibody-dependent enhancement. A dengue vaccine-induced antibody response weighted towards a single dengue virus serotype can mimic this phenomenon.

Several vaccines have been in clinical development for years, and most show that they induce neutralizing antibodies against all four serotypes. Yet, research has also shown that the creation of neutralizing antibodies alone does not correlate to protection against clinical disease. The investigators conducted experiments to compare the properties of antibodies against wild-type Dengue viruses and the properties of antibodies produced by a leading vaccine candidate—Dengvaxia—which the pharmaceutical company Sanofi Pasteur created using all four dengue virus serotypes in one formulation.

“We compared the properties of 1) neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) induced by wild type DENV1 or 3 infections, which are strongly correlated with protection from repeat infections, and 2) NAbs induced by Dengvaxia in individuals who subsequently experienced DENV1 or DENV3 breakthrough infections,” the authors wrote. “Wild type infections induced NAbs that recognized epitopes unique (type-specific) to each serotype, whereas the vaccine stimulated qualitatively different NAbs that recognized epitopes conserved (cross-reactive) between serotypes.”

The research team’s data showed that wild-type infections induced neutralizing and protective antibodies that recognized an epitope unique to each serotype. The vaccine, though, mainly stimulated neutralizing antibodies that recognized epitopes common among all serotypes. In vaccine trials, these antibodies did not protect children from dengue. In the past, researchers have considered all dengue neutralizing antibodies to be protective in people. This appears to not be the case, according to this UNC-led research.

“Our results suggest that a safe and effective dengue virus vaccine needs to stimulate neutralizing antibodies targeting unique sites on each of the four dengue serotypes,” concluded co-first author Cameron Adams, a medical and graduate student in the UNC Medical Scientist Training Program. “Not merely the neutralizing antibodies against cross-reactive epitopes common to all four dengue types.”

Previous articleAI Predicts 20,000 Unknown Associations between Viruses and Susceptible Mammalian Species
Next article“New Era of Medicine”: Researchers Publish First Positive Clinical Data for In Vivo Genome Editing in Humans