Leading the Way in Life Science Technologies

GEN Exclusives

More »


More »
December 01, 2009 (Vol. 29, No. 21)

Pressure Cycling for Sample Preparation

PCT System Provides Automated Alternative to Manual Methods

  • Biological samples are highly heterogeneous, diverse, and complex. Virtually all analysis requires some type of sample preparation, yet analytical scientists often overlook the importance of this step. Ideally, sample preparation should be straightforward, reproducible, and capable of releasing all relevant analytes while preserving their structural integrity and biological activity.

    Conventional biological sample preparation methods include mortar and pestle grinding, sonication, rotor-stator homogenization, French press, bead beating, freezer milling, enzymatic digestion, and chemical dissolution. All suffer from variability due to the method itself or operator inconsistencies. Moreover, they can result in destruction or incomplete release of analytes.

    Pressure cycling technology (PCT) uses alternating cycles of hydrostatic pressure between ambient and ultrahigh levels (approximately 35,000 psi) to release target molecules safely and reproducibly from a wide variety of biological samples. 

    A PCT system consists of a Barocycler™ instrument, which generates alternating levels of hydrostatic pressure, and single-use sample processing containers. Pressure, pressure chamber temperature, and duration are under operator control. Pressure BioSciences has developed several kits for specific sample types and downstream analysis applications.

  • General Procedure

    Click Image To Enlarge +
    Figure 1. Analysis of mouse liver lysates by 2DGE using sonication (A), PCT (B), and ground glass tissue grinder (C): Total number of distinguishable protein spots: PCT–1,273, sonication–1,073, and tissue grinder–1,098.

    PCT is compatible with a wide array of reagents for the extraction of analytes of interest. For proteins or nucleic acid extraction from animal tissue, 50–150 mg of sample is placed inside a Pulse tube and subjected to a suitable pressure-cycling regimen. For tough or fibrous tissue such as animal muscle or plant leaves the sample may be pretreated with the PCT shredder directly in the tube. This step rapidly grinds the sample to increase surface area and improve extraction efficiency.

    The extraction or lysis reagent is then added, and the sealed Pulse tube is placed into the Barocycler pressure chamber. During the PCT process, the sample is repeatedly pressurized and depressurized to lyse the cells. In addition, the moving ram of the Pulse tube repeatedly forces the solid tissue through the stationary lysis disk, further facilitating tissue disruption and cell lysis.

    Most PCT runs for nucleic acid or protein extraction require about 10 minutes, however some difficult to extract samples may require up to 30 minutes or more for efficient extraction. After the PCT process, the Pulse tube is removed from the pressure chamber, and the sample is transferred to a centrifuge tube for further processing or analysis.

  • Proteomics

    Click Image To Enlarge +
    Figure 2. 2-D gel analysis of extracted proteins from C. elegans: 37% higher protein yields (t=4.71, p<.01) were obtained using the PCT SPS relative to sonication.

    PCT’s initial target areas are genomics and proteomics, as well as lipidomics and small molecule analysis. Proteomics presents a unique situation for analytical scientists. The approximately one million potentially relevant components of the human proteome exist at a concentration dynamic range estimated at 1014. These numbers represent extremes that, even under ideal sample-preparation conditions, push the capabilities of modern instrumentation to its limits.

    The results illustrated in Figure 1 show a comparison between PCT and two commonly used sample-preparation techniques for protein extraction from mouse liver lysates. PCT uncovered 200 and 175 more proteins than sonication and ground-glass tissue grinding, respectively. For this sample, PCT combines the advantages of grinding and sonication, providing several higher molecular weight spots than sonication, and more low molecular weight spots than grinding.

    Similarly, a proteomic analysis of C. elegans found that PCT produced more protein spots and more higher molecular weight proteins than sonication (Figure 2).

Related content