GEN Exclusives

More »

GEN News Highlights

More »
May 1, 2013

Soligenix, Intrexon Team Up on Dual-Purpose Drug Discovery Initiative

  • Soligenix and Intrexon are collaborating to develop and commercialize mAb therapies for new biodefense and infectious disease applications, the firms have announced.

    Under the terms of the agreement, the biopharma firm and synthetic biology company intend to develop therapies for melioidosis—a disease caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei, which the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services considers a high-priority biodefense threat with the potential for widespread dissemination through aerosol. B. pseudomallei is a Gram-negative bacteria that is highly resistant to antibiotic treatments, the firms noted. Melioidosis follows HIV/AIDS and TB as the third most common cause of death from infectious disease in Southeast Asia, the companies added.

    More specifically, through this collaboration, Intrexon will provide discovery and development of therapeutic antibody candidates, followed by production of mAbs targeting melioidosis, while Soligenix is responsible for preclinical and clinical development, regulatory and government interactions, and commercialization.

    This collaboration “is unique because the goal is to develop a therapy that will treat both a deadly disease currently affecting millions of people as well as fight a potential biological weapon,” Soligenix CEO Christopher Schaber said in a company statement.

Add a comment

  • You must be signed in to perform this action.
    Click here to Login or Register for free.
    You will be taken back to your selected item after Login/Registration.

Related content


GEN Jobs powered by connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
More »

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

The Triple Package and Success

One theory for explaining “success," put forward by Amy Chua Jed Rubenfeld, posits cultural traits such as a superiority complex, personal insecurity and impulse control. Union College professors Joshua Hart and Christopher Chabris counter that intelligence, conscientiousness, and economic advantage are the most likely elements of success, regardless of ethnicity. Do you think that Hart-Chabris make a better argument for achieving success than the Chua-Rubenfeld theory?

More »