GEN Exclusives

More »

GEN News Highlights

More »
Jan 31, 2008

Scientists Identify Protein’s Role in Heart Attack Response

  • Yale School of Medicine researchers report that the protein macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) influences the heart’s response to a lack of oxygen and blood flow.

    Previously, scientists showed that MIF regulates the immune response, contributing to hardening of the arteries, arthritis, and the body’s response to infection. The current study found that mice lacking the MIF gene had a deficient AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) response and suffered more severe heart attacks than mice with an intact MIF gene. AMPK is a cellular-stress response enzyme that regulates the cellular-energy balance and protects the heart from injury during a heart attack.

    A common variation in the MIF gene also leads to lower levels of MIF protein expression. The study showed that cells from people with this genetic variant also have less activation of AMPK. “This suggests that we might be able to identify individuals based on their genetic characteristics who are likely to suffer more cardiac damage during a heart attack,” says senior author, Lawrence Young, M.D., professor of cardiovascular medicine and physiology.

    The research group also notes that MIF modulates the activation of the cardioprotective AMPK pathway during ischaemia, functionally linking inflammation and metabolism in the heart.

    The study is published in the January 31 issue of Nature.


GEN Jobs powered by connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
More »

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

The Triple Package and Success

One theory for explaining “success," put forward by Amy Chua Jed Rubenfeld, posits cultural traits such as a superiority complex, personal insecurity and impulse control. Union College professors Joshua Hart and Christopher Chabris counter that intelligence, conscientiousness, and economic advantage are the most likely elements of success, regardless of ethnicity. Do you think that Hart-Chabris make a better argument for achieving success than the Chua-Rubenfeld theory?

More »