GEN Exclusives

More »

GEN News Highlights

More »
Feb 17, 2009

Merck Serono Licenses Flamel Technology for Roughly $6.3M

Merck Serono Licenses Flamel Technology for Roughly $6.3M

Merck Serono has exercised option for partnership with Flamel

  • Merck Serono exercised its option to partner with Flamel Technologies, paying €5 million, or approximately $6.3 million. The companies entered into a full license agreement, according to which Flamel's Medusa technology will be applied for the extended release of Merck's therapeutic marketed protein.

    This decision follows promising results from the collaboration between the two companies first hatched in December 2007. At the time Merck Serono paid €2 million to evaluate Medusa.

    Under the terms of the new agreement, Flamel will be eligible to receive further payments based on research achievements and development milestones. Merck will fund all R&D efforts at Flamel.

    "As Flamel's Medusa technology allows, among other significant advantages, for long sustained release of injectable proteins compared to standard formulations, we hope to offer an improved convenience for patients requiring treatment by injection," says Bernhard Kirschbaum, evp of R&D at Merck.

    The Medusa technology is a self-assembled poly-aminoacid nanoparticle system and a carrier for the development of novel long-acting formulations of proteins, peptides, and other large molecules, says Flamel.ADNFCR-2184-ID-19030978-ADNFCR


GEN Jobs powered by connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
More »

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

The Triple Package and Success

One theory for explaining “success," put forward by Amy Chua Jed Rubenfeld, posits cultural traits such as a superiority complex, personal insecurity and impulse control. Union College professors Joshua Hart and Christopher Chabris counter that intelligence, conscientiousness, and economic advantage are the most likely elements of success, regardless of ethnicity. Do you think that Hart-Chabris make a better argument for achieving success than the Chua-Rubenfeld theory?

More »