GEN Exclusives

More »

GEN News Highlights

More »
Apr 19, 2012

Human Genome Sciences Rejects $2.6B Hostile Takeover Bid by GSK

  • Human Genome Sciences (HGS) has rejected a $13 per share, approximately $2.6 billion hostile takeover bid by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) claiming—not unexpectedly—that it doesn’t consider the offer represents the firm’s true value. HGS’ stock closed at $7.17 per share yesterday, but has seriously nosedived over the last 12 months from a high of just under $30 per share at about this time last year.

    In early morning trading today, however, HGS' stock skyrocketed to reach $14.48, a 101.95% increase from yesterday's close. HGS says that it is looking at viable options for its future, including a potential sale, and has invited GSK to participate in the process.

    The firm has, in addition, requested additional information from GSK on darapladib and albiglutide, two Phase III products in the latter’s pipeline to which HGS has substantial financial rights. Darapladib is in development for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, and albiglutide is currently being developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

    HGS’ monoclonal antibody therapeutic Benlysta was approved last year by FDA for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. The drug was developed in collaboration with GSK under a 2006 cost- and profit-sharing agreement. 

Add a comment

  • You must be signed in to perform this action.
    Click here to Login or Register for free.
    You will be taken back to your selected item after Login/Registration.

Related content


GEN Jobs powered by connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
More »

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

The Triple Package and Success

One theory for explaining “success," put forward by Amy Chua Jed Rubenfeld, posits cultural traits such as a superiority complex, personal insecurity and impulse control. Union College professors Joshua Hart and Christopher Chabris counter that intelligence, conscientiousness, and economic advantage are the most likely elements of success, regardless of ethnicity. Do you think that Hart-Chabris make a better argument for achieving success than the Chua-Rubenfeld theory?

More »