GEN Exclusives

More »

GEN News Highlights

More »
Feb 12, 2008

Dana-Farber Allies With Merck & Co. on Cancer Drug R&D

  • The Center for Applied Cancer Science (CACS) of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Merck & Co. inked a collaboration to identify drug targets and develop related compounds for cancer indications. The partners hope to improve the success rate of investigational drugs entering clinical trials.

    “Currently, there is a 95 percent failure rate in cancer drug development,” points out Ronald DePinho, M.D., of the CACS. “Drugs that pass safety testing in Phase I trials too often fail to show efficacy in later-stage trials, or prove effective in only a small subset of patients.”

    Under the terms of the agreement, the CACS will receive upfront and research support funding from Merck as well as milestone and royalties. CACS will conduct integrative and cross-species genomic analysis as well as multilevel functional and clinicopathological validation testing. Additionally, the CACS will work with Merck on the drug assay development of lead compound discovery and to test these drugs in CACS’ model systems that closely replicate human disease.

    The collaboration will also further evaluate tumor pathobiology and clinical outcomes to better pinpoint the tumor types most susceptible to the drug.


GEN Jobs powered by connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
More »

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

The Triple Package and Success

One theory for explaining “success," put forward by Amy Chua Jed Rubenfeld, posits cultural traits such as a superiority complex, personal insecurity and impulse control. Union College professors Joshua Hart and Christopher Chabris counter that intelligence, conscientiousness, and economic advantage are the most likely elements of success, regardless of ethnicity. Do you think that Hart-Chabris make a better argument for achieving success than the Chua-Rubenfeld theory?

More »