Leading the Way in Life Science Technologies

GEN Exclusives

More »

GEN News Highlights

More »
Jun 11, 2010

BioTime Sets Up OrthoCyte Subsidiary for Stem Cell Based Orthopedic Products

BioTime Sets Up OrthoCyte Subsidiary for Stem Cell Based Orthopedic Products

Business complements firm’s existing cancer and stem cell research products subsidiaries. [© London_England - Fotolia.com]

  • BioTime has set up a subsidiary OrthoCyte to focus on the development of novel stem cell-based regenerative products for orthopedics. Potential products will include therapeutics for bone, cartilage, tendons, and ligaments. The firm says the move fits in with its long-term strategy of establishing subsidiaries focused on specific therapeutic applications of its technology.

    CSO of OrthoCyte will be Arnold I. Caplan, Ph.D., professor of biology and general medical sciences and director of the skeletal research center at Case Western Reserve University. BioTime’s existing subsidiaries include the cancer therapeutics-focused OncoCyte (www.oncocyte.com) and the stem cell research products business, Embryome Sciences.

    Formation of the new subsidiary follows BioTime's acquisition in May of Singapore-based ES Cell International. BioTime’s push into Asian markets was given a significant leg up in September 2009, with the firm’s establishment of an Asian subsidiary in China.

    BioTime has a two-pronged business focus, centered on the development of both stem cell technology and products for use in regenerative medicine as well as blood plasma volume expanders and related technology for use in surgery, emergency trauma treatment, and other applications. The firm’s lead commercial product is Hextend®, a formulation of 6% hetastarch combined with a physiologically balanced crystalloid carrier, which BioTime claims more closely mirrors plasma electrolyte balance than 6% hetastarch in 0.9% sodium chloride.



Related content

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

Scientifically Studying Ecstasy

MDMA (commonly known as the empathogen “ecstasy”) is classified as a Schedule 1 drug, which is reserved for compounds with no accepted medical use and a high abuse potential. Two researchers from Stanford, however, call for a rigorous scientific exploration of MDMA's effects to identify precisely how the drug works, the data from which could be used to develop therapeutic compounds.

Do you agree that ecstasy should be studied for its potential therapeutic benefits?

More »