GEN Exclusives

More »

GEN News Highlights

More »
Oct 31, 2006

Biomira Gains Oncology Therapeutics through Purchase of ProlX

  • Biomira acquired ProlX Pharmaceuticals, a privately held biopharmaceutical company developing therapeutics for cancer.
    The acquisition will give Biomira a portfolio of oncology products. The company’s pipeline will include one product expected to enter Phase III by the end of 2007, one product expected to enter Phase II in the fourth quarter of 2006, and two products expected to begin clinical trials between June and October, 2007.

    Following closing, Biomira will pay $3 million in cash and approximately 17,878,000 shares of Biomira common stock in return for all of the outstanding stock of ProlX. In addition, there may be up to three future payments based on the achievement of specified milestones. A payment in

    Biomira common stock of $5 million is due upon the initiation of the first Phase III trial of a ProlX product. Another payment worth $10 million of Biomira common stock is expected upon regulatory approval of a ProlX product in a major market. Finally, under certain circumstances, ProlX shareholders may also receive a share of revenue from a potential collaboration agreement for a ProlX product in a specified nononcology indication.


GEN Jobs powered by connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
More »

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

The Triple Package and Success

One theory for explaining “success," put forward by Amy Chua Jed Rubenfeld, posits cultural traits such as a superiority complex, personal insecurity and impulse control. Union College professors Joshua Hart and Christopher Chabris counter that intelligence, conscientiousness, and economic advantage are the most likely elements of success, regardless of ethnicity. Do you think that Hart-Chabris make a better argument for achieving success than the Chua-Rubenfeld theory?

More »