Leading the Way in Life Science Technologies

GEN Exclusives

More »


More »
Jan 15, 2009 (Vol. 29, No. 2)

Optimization of Binding Interaction Studies

New Approach Advocates Interspot Referencing Using Multiplexed SPR Arrays

  • The Traditional Approach

    Click Image To Enlarge +
    Figure 1. Flow Cell geometry of a traditional SPR system

    SPR experiments for the determination of kinetic rate constants have often been run sequentially, using two flow cells, one as a reference and one for the binding interaction (Figure 1). The reference cell did not contain any ligand and served to measure nonspecific binding of the analyte to the surface of the chip, bulk effects, and signal drift. 

    A single concentration of analyte was flowed over the ligand of interest bound to the surface in the sample flow cell, and the corresponding response data were collected. The reference cell signal was subtracted from the signal in the sample flow cell. The surface was then regenerated (analyte removed) to prepare the ligand for the next concentration of analyte. 

    This sequence was repeated until a full analyte concentration series was measured.  Such a sequential approach necessitates that one flow cell always be used as a reference, rather than to produce additional binding interaction data. The end result is reduced sample throughput, as well as the risk of loss of ligand activity due to repeated regeneration cycles.

Related content

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

Scientifically Studying Ecstasy

MDMA (commonly known as the empathogen “ecstasy”) is classified as a Schedule 1 drug, which is reserved for compounds with no accepted medical use and a high abuse potential. Two researchers from Stanford, however, call for a rigorous scientific exploration of MDMA's effects to identify precisely how the drug works, the data from which could be used to develop therapeutic compounds.

Do you agree that ecstasy should be studied for its potential therapeutic benefits?

More »