GEN Exclusives

More »

Feature Articles

More »
Oct 1, 2009 (Vol. 29, No. 17)

Laskers Honor Stem Cell & Cancer Research

Basic and Medical Investigations Recognized Expected to Give the Biotech Industry a Boost

  • The 2009 Lasker Awards, which were announced last month, have far-reaching implications for the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, as companies seek to expand their research and development to fulfill the promise of stem cells. Collaborations between academia and industry will accelerate, particularly in adult stem cell investigation.

    “The 2009 Lasker Awards underscore the ways in which our commitment to medical research opens up new areas of inquiry and enables science-based decision making to improve the public’s health,” Maria Freire, Ph.D., president of the Lasker Foundation, said. “The Laureates have played crucial roles in finding solutions to a host of vexing health problems. Lives everywhere may be saved and improved because of their bold innovations in public health, cell differentiation, and cancer treatments.”

    Two scientists who made key advances in nuclear reprogramming and stem cell research and three investigators responsible for revolutionizing the treatment of leukemia have won this year’s Lasker Awards.

    The Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award will be presented to Sir John Gurdon, D.Phil., D.Sc., FRS, emeritus professor and group leader, Gurdon Institute of Cancer & Developmental Biology, University of Cambridge, and Shinya Yamanaka, M.D., Ph.D., Institute for Integrated Cell-Material Sciences, Kyoto University, for discoveries into the process that instructs specialized adult cells to form stem cells.

    The 2009 Lasker-DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award will be given to Brian J. Druker, M.D., professor of medicine and director of the Leukemia Center, Oregon Health Sciences University; Nicholas B. Lydon, Ph.D., formerly of Novartis; and Charles L. Sawyers, M.D., head of the laboratory in human oncology and pathogenesis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, for outstanding therapeutic research on chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

    Both the basic research and clinical awards clearly illustrate the potential of translational medicine to transform healthcare by expeditiously moving new discoveries from the lab into the clinic.

    The groundbreaking research efforts of Drs. Druker, Lydon, and Sawyers have already paid off in the development and FDA approval of Gleevec as an effective and well-tolerated treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. Meanwhile, stem cell expertise gained in the basic research laboratory is efficiently heading toward clinical applications in regenerative medicine. The Lasker awards are a validation of nuclear reprogramming and will serve as a real shot in the arm for the emerging stem cell industry.

    The focus of the Lasker Awards will help improve the difficult financial environment in which cash-strapped biotech companies have been operating for over a year. Since the awards highlight both a novel approach to cancer therapy and a promising method for generating stem cells that avoids the immunogenicity problem, this encouraging news is likely to attract significant money that’s been sitting on the sidelines for investment in the life science business.

  • Nuclear Reprogramming

    Nuclear reprogramming opened new avenues for pursuing a range of aspects of embryonic and adult stem cell research, understanding inscrutable diseases, and exploring personalized cell-replacement therapies.

    Beginning in the mid-1950s, Dr. Gurdon showed that most of the body’s cell types retain all of their genetic information as they specialize and that the right conditions can wake up genes that turn idle during development. Dr. Gurdon’s discoveries in frog eggs ignited the entire field of nuclear reprogramming whereby specialized adult cells turn into stem cells that can then differentiate to form many of the body’s tissues. This line of inquiry with mammalian eggs allowed other work to unfold, including the creation by Scottish scientists of Dolly the sheep in 1997 as the first clone made from the nucleus of a fully specialized mammalian adult cell.

    With Dr. Gurdon’s findings in mind but without the need for eggs, Dr. Yamanaka, who is also a senior investigator at the Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, reported in 2006 the reprogramming of fully differentiated mouse skin cells into stem cells that can specialize into many fetal and adult types of cells. Subsequent research based on the findings of Drs. Gurdon and Yamanaka has the potential to make reprogrammed cells a source of patient-specific cells for use in medicine that will enable the body to regenerate, repair, replace, and restore diseased or damaged cells, tissues, and organs.

    Professor Sir Ian Wilmut, director of the Centre for Regenerative Medicine at the University of Edinburgh and editor of Cloning and Stem Cells, views the induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell approach as one of the breakthroughs of this decade and that succeeding generations of scientists may judge iPS as a breakthrough of the new century.

    “They are comparatively easy to obtain and combine the main advantages of embryonic stem cells and cells from adults,” he explained. “They can form any tissue and multiply many times in culture, but you also know their genotype. Knowing the genotype may be useful in the longer term, because the iPS cells will be an immunological match to the person from whom they were derived.”

    The iPS advantage has already been important for a different application, continued Professor Wilmut. “You can use cells from a person who has an inherited disease to study that disease. There are hundreds of different inherited diseases. Projects using iPS cells are already being developed to study diseases as varied as motor neuron disease, some psychiatric diseases, and cancer.”

    Graham Parker, Ph.D., assistant professor (research), department of pediatrics, Wayne State University School of Medicine and editor of Stem Cells and Development, calls nuclear reprogramming technology a “very exciting development. Some might say it’s unbelievable that the introduction of just a few genes can turn a somatic cell pluripotent.”

    Dr. Parker, however, also raises a cautionary flag. “The problems and issues that have limited progress of embryonic stem cell research will still apply to induced pluripotent stem cells. We are fantastically ignorant of how the programming to pluripotency occurs,” he noted. “The efficiency levels are so low as to defy a clear understanding of which genes/proteins at what concentration are truly required. At the moment we are definitely dealing with a phenomenon that we see works and produces something useful, but the details are still squarely in a black box.”

    Linda Powers, cofounder and managing director of Toucan Capital, which has 16 stem cell or regenerative medicine companies in its portfolio, thinks the introduction of the nuclear reprogramming technique is quite important for at least two reasons.

    “First, iPS has rapidly moved the whole regen medicine field away from embryonic stem cells. This change of focus will extricate the stem cell field from the ethics issues and controversies, which continue to be a restraining factor, even under the new Obama Administration,” she emphasized.

    “Second, iPS is turning the whole field’s focus to autologous (personalized) products and treatments. In recent years, the strong prevailing dogma about clinical applications and commercialization in the regen med field has been that products must be allogeneic (nonpersonalized) in order to be commercially and medically practical. We, at Toucan, believe that there are some uses for which allogeneic cells are appropriate: principally, situations such as acute MI, where there is no time for an autologous product (at least initially), and situations in which the cells are only being asked to perform limited functions such as trophic support or suppression of inflammation.

    “However,” she continued, “we believe strongly that for clinical applications where there is time, and where the cells are being asked to perform actual repair functions, that autologous products and treatments are greatly preferable. In essence, we believe the business model should be made to fit the biology, rather than trying to force the biology to fit a convenient business model. So, we think it is quite important that iPS technology is now turning everyone’s thinking toward autologous products and treatments.”


Add a comment

  • You must be signed in to perform this action.
    Click here to Login or Register for free.
    You will be taken back to your selected item after Login/Registration.

Related content

Jobs

GEN Jobs powered by HireLifeScience.com connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
 Searching...

Unable to get Jobs Listings.

More »

GEN Poll

More » Poll Results »

Lab-Grown Vaginas

Which body part do you think will be successfully engineered in the lab next?