Leading the Way in Life Science Technologies

GEN Exclusives

More »

Feature Articles

More »
Feb 15, 2010 (Vol. 30, No. 4)

Insights Mount on Copy Number Variants

Growing Knowledge Has Direct Application to a Better Understanding of Disease

  • Pharmacogenomics

    In addition to their link to medical conditions, CNVs are increasingly implicated in shaping the response to pharmaceutical compounds.

    “It has become quite an exciting time in pharmacogenomics because it really was a relatively theoretical field up until a year or so ago. That’s when we started seeing more clinical trials which demonstrated some of its utility in the clinic,” says Howard L. McLeod, Pharm D., distinguished professor of pharmacy and medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel-Hill.

    One of the implications is that, as a result of CNVs, certain individuals might not respond to medication, need larger doses, or face a higher risk for adverse effects. Therefore, if there is an altered copy number for a gene encoding proteins that transport or metabolically degrade a drug, or affect its target, this piece of information can be used to more carefully adjust a drug’s dosage.

    “It is not surprising that if there are three copies of a metabolism gene instead of two, the drug is going to be cleared much faster and it cannot have its effect,” explains Dr. McLeod.

    Recently, Dr. McLeod and colleagues found that TOPI, which encodes topoisomerase I, an enzyme involved in cleaving and rejoining DNA during replication, recombination, and repair, was amplified in 23% of the individuals with colorectal cancer. In addition, 60% of the tumors analyzed were diploid for both TOPI and TYMS, the gene encoding thymidylate synthase, and this genomic profile was associated with less favorable response to chemotherapy.

    Besides their promise in tailoring individual therapy, CNVs have become essential in an additional context. When Dr. McLeod and collaborators recently examined the WHO list of essential medicines, they identified several compounds for which the genes encoding metabolic, transport, or target proteins show copy number polymorphisms among populations. 

    “The clinical implications are dramatic,” points out Dr. McLeod. “If we know that there is a likelihood of increased risk of adverse effects or a lack of efficacy as a result of a common genetic variant, we can better tailor therapy in a specific country. This involves not individualizing for the person, but individualizing for the country, based on the overall risk. Copy number variation is not only an individual patient issue but also a public health issue.”

  • How CNVs Emerge

    Although CNVs are becoming more relevant in clinical medicine, relatively little is known about how they emerge and what their genomic distribution is within and across species. Recent developments promise to shed light on this issue.

    Harris A. Lewin, Ph.D., professor of immunogenetics and director of the Institute of Genomic Biology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and collaborators recently conducted the first multispecies whole-genome comparison of chromosomal organization in 10 amniote species. This approach examined evolutionary breakpoints in chromosomes and facilitated the visualization of genome rearrangements over evolutionary time.

    While some regions in the genome appear to be conserved for millions of years, others, known as evolutionary hotspot regions, are characterized by a high rate of gene birth and gene death. They are much more likely to be involved in rearrangements.

    The researchers report that for some species, eight to nine times more structural variants are observed within evolutionary breakpoint regions as compared to the rest of the genome.

    “We discovered that the evolutionary breakpoint regions have a much higher density of structural variations,” notes Dr. Lewin. Most of these structural variations include changes in gene copy numbers.

    “Copy number variants are not randomly distributed in the genome but are heavily weighted toward the genomic locations where chromosome rearrangement is happening during evolution.”

    CNVs could thus be a consequence of chromosomal rearrangement and repair events, or they could be part of the mechanism that is driving rearrangements by non-allelic homologue recombination.

    “These evolutionary hotspots seem to be the places where, during evolution, new variation is generated on which natural selection can then act,” explains Dr. Lewin.

    Previously, Dr. Lewin and his colleagues identified a relationship between evolutionary breakpoint regions and highly recurrent cancer breakpoints frequently described in leukemias and lymphomas, raising the possibility that these chromosomal regions are inherently unstable. This concept could help in understanding how CNVs shape several medical conditions. Examining the location of these chromosomal rearrangements through an evolutionary timeframe provides an intriguing approach to map out the genomic regions that are particularly susceptible to medically relevant CNVs.

    “Every human genome is different as is every animal genome. What we don’t understand is how microalterations in genome architecture, such as copy number variation, affect disease,” says Dr. Lewin.

    Genetic diseases and chromosome abnormalities could very well represent an unfortunate consequence of our need to generate genetic variation. Ultimately, it is diversity within a species that emerges as perhaps the most powerful factor to guarantee adaptability and survival.

    It would be difficult to envision all individuals within any species exhibiting susceptibilities to the same diseases, adverse reactions to the same therapeutic compounds, or sensitivities to the same environmental toxins. CNVs could very well represent an indispensible safety net, instrumental for the successful existence of every species on the planet. 

Related content

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

Cancer vs. Zika: What Worries You Most?

While Zika continues to garner a lot of news coverage, a Mayo Clinic survey reveals that Americans believe the country’s most significant healthcare challenge is cancer. Compared to other diseases, does the possibility of developing cancer worry you the most?

More »