GEN Exclusives

More »

Feature Articles

More »
Jul 1, 2009 (Vol. 29, No. 13)

Getting Real with Downstream Processing

Technological Hoopla Aside, Simplification Is the One Trend on which Everyone Can Agree

  • Titers, Protein A Issues Overblown?

    Click Image To Enlarge +
    According to GE Healthcare, the plasma protein industry is moving more toward chromatography-based purifications, because it helps ensure product purity, reproducibility, and safety.

    Eric Grund, Ph.D., senior director, biopharma applications GE Healthcare believes that the buzz over rising protein titers is over-blown. Titers have been rising steadily for a decade, he argues, and bioprocessors have had more than sufficient opportunity to respond with larger, or in many cases, more-efficient separations. Moreover, higher titers have been accompanied, generally speaking, with raw product material that is more concentrated and of higher-quality, which has enabled simpler downstream processing, for example, by cutting the number of purification steps.

    Dr. Grund, also a steadfast supporter of protein A capture, believes that to propose  precipitation or cation exchange capture is nothing but an attempt to fix something that already works phenomenally well.

    “It’s naïve to say protein A is too expensive, and therefore, must be replaced. Protein A does most of the purification work for mAb processes, providing a product that is 99% pure. Precipitation cannot come close to that and provide a safe product.”

    Dr. Grund notes that the plasma protein industry, which traditionally has used precipitation to produce IgG and albumin, is moving more and more toward chromatography-based purifications because “that is what makes these products highly pure, reproducible, and safe.”

    Moreover, he feels that protein A’s reliability as a platform technology is a huge advantage. “If you have 20 mAbs in your pipeline, you can purify them all without too much trouble.”

    Manufacturers of blockbuster products, says Dr. Grund, will always look for cost advantages through lean and six sigma approaches, and through optimizing utilization of plant resources. But that is not justification for abandoning tried-and-true methodology that generates safe products. “Of course some monoclonals can probably be prepared using methods developed in the plasma products industry years ago, but I’m not certain you’ll get the same level of purity or yield as you will with protein A capture.”


Readers' Comments

Posted 07/29/2009 by Mr

To say that one Protein A chromatography step from cell culture harvest will provide 99% purity is a little overboard. I have seen 85-90% purity, but the difference between 99% purity and 95% purity itself is pretty huge in purification, let alone the difference between 99% and 90%.

Add a comment

  • You must be signed in to perform this action.
    Click here to Login or Register for free.
    You will be taken back to your selected item after Login/Registration.

Related content

Jobs

GEN Jobs powered by HireLifeScience.com connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
 Searching...

Unable to get Jobs Listings.

More »

GEN Poll

More » Poll Results »

Biosimilars

Compared to the original biologics, do you think biosimilars run the risks of being less effective and causing more side effects?