GEN Exclusives

More »


More »
Jul 1, 2009 (Vol. 29, No. 13)

Expanding Disposable Depth-Filter Applications

Pall Focuses on the Improvement of Process Clarification Operations

  • Test Overview

    Click Image To Enlarge +
    Figure 2. Comparative filtration capacities for Supracap 100 capsules, Supradisc modules, and Stax capsules (at 1 bart dP)

    Test Fluid: Homogenized Yeast Test Solution, developed to be representative of a postcentrifuge mammalian cell type process solution.

    Depth Filter Medium: Seitz grade EKSP

    Filter Formats: Supracap™ 100 capsules, Supradisc™ II 16-inch modules, and Stax capsules (Table, Figure 2)

    Sheet Format: Single Layer

    Stax Port Configuration: Inlet, bottom of stack; Outlet, top of stack

    Feed Flow Rate: Constant at 300  L/m2/hr (typically the maximum flow rate used for biotech applications)

    Volumetric Throughput Target: 300 L/m2 (typical volumetric throughput value for biotech applications)

  • Trial Procedure

    Click Image To Enlarge +
    Filter details

    • Preflush all filters with filtered process water, 50 L/m2 at a minimum flow rate of 300 lmh.
    • Measure the pressure drop characteristics through all assemblies at flow rates of 100, 200, and 300 lmh.
    • Perform filterability trials at a constant feed flow rate of 300 lmh.
    • Record time, feed pressure, filtrate pressure, filtrate volume, and turbidity throughout the trial.
    • Continue trial until the pressure drop across the filter is a minimum of 1.0 bar (14.5 psi).
    • All instrumentation must be calibrated prior to test program.
    • Analyze samples at regular intervals for instantaneous turbidity measurement.

Related content


GEN Jobs powered by connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
More »

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

The Triple Package and Success

One theory for explaining “success," put forward by Amy Chua Jed Rubenfeld, posits cultural traits such as a superiority complex, personal insecurity and impulse control. Union College professors Joshua Hart and Christopher Chabris counter that intelligence, conscientiousness, and economic advantage are the most likely elements of success, regardless of ethnicity. Do you think that Hart-Chabris make a better argument for achieving success than the Chua-Rubenfeld theory?

More »