Cell-signaling research encompasses a range of cellular mechanisms and activities, including how cells communicate with each other, how they respond to external stimuli—activators, inhibitors, or foreign entities—and how signals are transferred and received within an individual cell, including the translocation of chemical messengers across cell membranes, from cytoplasm to nucleus, and between organelles.
The ability to dissect the signaling pathways that mediate these activities will contribute to a better understanding of normal cell development, differentiation, and death, and changes relevant to specific disease processes. This knowledge will also help guide the discovery of more targeted therapeutic agents.
New techniques for studying cell signaling were explored in a series of technology workshops at the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB) meeting held last month in San Diego.
An underlying theme of the presentations was the trend in signal-transduction studies away from Western blot-based experiments that can identify changes in protein-expression levels in cell extracts, to more quantitative and sensitive assay systems that can quantify subtle changes in protein levels, measure increases or decreases in post-translational modifications (PTMs) such as phosphorylation or methylation, interrogate targeted cell populations and monitor signaling at the level of an individual cell, and evaluate signaling activity in selected intracellular domains.
Cell-based assays and the application of advanced imaging technologies and detection reagents to cell-signaling research enable direct visualization of pathway stimulation, translocation of chemical messengers, and changes in cell morphology, cell-cycle regulation, and viability.
Furthermore, new reagents and detection methods are increasing the sensitivity of cell-signaling assays to the point where researchers no longer have to rely on artificial systems composed of engineered cell lines that overexpress selected cell-surface receptors and can begin to study signaling pathways in more physiologically relevant cell types such as primary cells and stem cells, as well as in tissue samples, model organisms, and small-animal disease models.
Scientists from PerkinElmer presented strategies to increase the sensitivity of cell-signaling assays to enable researchers to work with more physiological cell models. They highlighted the capability to detect and measure intracellular kinases and to elucidate kinase pathways using cell-based assays. These homogeneous assays can replace standard ELISAs, Western blots, and biochemical assays, and can detect endogenous full-length proteins in cell lysates in a range of cell lines including primary cells, reported the company.
Marina Bielefeld-Sevigny, Ph.D., vp and general manager, drug discovery and research reagents solutions, described how combining multiple kinase targets in pathway kits allows researchers to “determine the phosphorylation of different proteins in the kinase cascade in one experiment.”
She introduced the most recent additions to the AlphaScreen® SureFire® and AlphaLISA® platforms, based on the bead-based Alpha technology: 46 new cell-signaling pathway and biomarker research assay kits, including 24 No Wash cellular kinase and signaling-pathway kits, the latter targeting the MAPK pathway and Akt and NF-κB signaling. Compared to conventional ELISAs they offer increased sensitivity and are more readily automated, according to Dr. Bielefeld-Sevigny, who added that they also offer more quantitative results, are easier to use, and deliver faster results than Western blots.
For immunohistochemical techniques designed to detect specific proteins in tissue sections, sensitivity and low-level signal detection may be limiting factors. Proteins expressed at low levels or only by a subset of cells in a tissue sample may not generate a measurable signal using standard immunohistochemical protocols.
One approach to overcoming this problem is to greatly overexpress the target protein, generating an artificial model system. Dr. Bielefeld-Sevigny described another approach that takes advantage of recent enhancements to the company’s Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA)™ system, which can amplify a fluorescent or chromogenic signal. TSA binds to the antibody-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) complex, initiating an amplification cycle that increases the signal produced. The technology achieves increased signal detection sensitivity while using as much as 1,000-fold less primary antibody, she reported.
In the area of imaging technology for cell-based signal-transduction assays, she emphasized that data acquisition, handling, and analysis remain the main bottlenecks, with the volume and complexity of the data making interpretation of experimental results difficult and time consuming.
“The challenge for cellular imaging today is acquiring images with the right sensitivity, resolution, and speed. Image analysis, particularly for 3-D and live-cell imaging, become a large-scale computing problem, often requiring a 64-bit computing system solution.”
Image-analysis software is evolving to increase the speed of image acquisition and presentation, automate qualitative and quantitative analytical techniques, and simplify user interaction with the software’s data-management and analytical tools so researchers can more easily customize image visualization and analysis. Dr. Bielefeld-Sevigny reported that recent improvements to PerkinElmer’s Volocity® analysis software, working with the VoX 3D live-cell imaging system for example, allow for 3-D and 4-D image capture and visualization.
In an effort to facilitate sharing and comparison of images among researchers within or between academic laboratories, industry, and government research centers, PerkinElmer is participating in a consortium working to develop standardized formats for importing images. These standards are incorporated in the company’s Columbus™ software package for data management, storage, and retrieval.