GEN Exclusives

More »

BioMarket Trends

More »
May 15, 2009 (Vol. 29, No. 10)

Are In Vitro Diagnostics Recession-Proof?

While the Industry as a Whole Is Predicted to Emerge Unscathed, Some Segments Will Suffer

  • The Market in 2009

    Overall it is Kalorama’s view that despite the recession the market will be primarily status quo for the IVD industry over the next three to five years. The world market for in vitro diagnostics will approach $47 billion in 2009. The United States and Canada represent roughly 44% of this market. There are a number of reasons why we would hold to our numbers on IVDs.  

    • Less room to drop: In vitro diagnostics were the first products targeted for cutbacks in the major markets—the U.S., Europe, and Japan. Since the late 1980s healthcare payers have systematically frozen reimbursement rates for the existing group of tests and have imposed strict utilization guidelines for the adoption of new tests. The majority of labs located in the largest single market for IVD products, the U.S., acquire their instruments, reagents, and supplies for routine tests at rock bottom and discounted prices.  
    • Government stimulus: Healthcare initiatives proposed by the new U.S. administration further bolster the use of IVDs.
    • Unyielding demand: Demand for healthcare and thus diagnostic tests in all the major markets is driven by aging populations and increased incidence of conditions such as cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, arthritis, and obesity. There is an emerging menu of specialized tests for these diseases, but routine tests are used as the first line of diagnosis.
    • Emerging markets: The “Asian Tiger” has slowed but not stopped. Emerging markets, primarily China, India, and Eastern Europe, will still experience high market growth rates. This is fueled by privatization and health insurance initiatives. 
    • Institutionalized demand: Advancements in minimally invasive surgery and same-day interventions mean that in-patient populations need more acute care. This creates demand for faster test turnaround times and more hospital-based point-of-care type tests and instrumentation.
    • Stable market: The routine test segments—chemistry/immunoassay workstations, hematology, coagulation, and routine microbiology—make up some 50% of the dollar value of the hospital-based IVD market and about 70% of the market test-wise. These tests make up the basic investigation of any disease, and it is not anticipated that there can be much of a cutback on these tests.

    More expensive nucleic acid tests, pharmacodiagnostic tests, and immunoassays are widely expected to gain market share over the next five years. Some of these test segments may see some decreased utilization in the short term. But cost-benefit analysis, technological innovation, and investment in new test applications will lead to increasing market share for other segments. Cancer research will spur growth in histology/cytology, flow cytometry, and tumor markers. 

    As cost-management pressures continue to increase, private and public payers will make their decision whether to reimburse a new product based on its impact on patient care. No new test or test service can expect to be reimbursed simply because it appears to provide a technological improvement over the status quo.

    Managed care, HMO, and fee-for-service plans create reimbursement formularies that dictate which tests can be reimbursed for which patient diagnoses. Payer groups demand medical evidence related to the clinical and economic implications of a test that is not inherent in an FDA market application. They will look more closely at patient selection and at the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment protocols that will be influenced by the incorporation of a new test into their family of covered services.

    These developments will have a significant impact on all new tests but especially high-priced multiplexed gene tests for cancer. They are already coming under intense scrutiny, and most have been found to be investigational and so nonreimbursable except on a case-by-case basis. 

    Although individual product lines may suffer, Kalorama still sees high growth rates for molecular and pharmacogenomic tests as a category.


Add a comment

  • You must be signed in to perform this action.
    Click here to Login or Register for free.
    You will be taken back to your selected item after Login/Registration.

Related content

Jobs

GEN Jobs powered by HireLifeScience.com connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
 Searching...
More »

GEN Poll

More » Poll Results »

Stopping Research Fraud

What is the best approach to curbing scientific misconduct and outright fraud?