GEN Exclusives

More »

Tutorials

More »
Nov 15, 2011 (Vol. 31, No. 20)

Advances in Sophisticated Genome Editing

ssDNA Oligos and CompoZr ZFNs More Efficiently Produce Nucleotide Insertions and/or Deletions

  • VIDEO

    Dana Carroll, professor at the University of Utah and one of the originators of zinc finger nuclease (ZFN) technology, reflects on the platform’s potential for genetics.

    CompoZr® zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) from Sigma® Life Science enable efficient and affordable gene editing across many species and cell types, including humans, rats, mice, frogs, rabbits, pigs, cattle, C. elegans, and Drosophila.

    Recent literature has shown ZFNs mediating increasingly diverse types of in vitro genome modifications, some of which we describe in this tutorial, as well as the potential of in vivo genome editing through the restoration of hemostasis in a mouse model of hemophilia. Simultaneously, advances inCompoZr ZFN production and design have halved the price of both Custom ZFNs and Knockout ZFNs for any gene in the human, mouse or rat genomes, bringing CompoZr ZFNs within the budget of any laboratory.

    CompoZr ZFNs work by creating a user-defined double-stranded break (DSB) that is repaired primarily by one of two natural mechanisms—nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR). NHEJ can create nucleotide insertions or deletions (indels) that lead to frameshifts, subsequent nonsense-mediated decay, and functional gene knockout.

    In the presence of a DNA donor plasmid that flanks the DSB, HDR can integrate entire transgenes, fuse reporter genes, introduce or correct a point mutation, or perform many other sophisticated genomic modifications.

    Donor plasmid design, while an established process, can require several weeks from initial concept to delivery and costs hundreds of dollars. A recent Nature Methods publication by Chen et al. reports the use of ssDNA oligonucleotides (ssODNs), as opposed to donor plasmids, to derive three unique genetic outcomes—targeted point mutation, targeted gene deletion up to 100 kb using a single CompoZr ZFN, and targeted insertion of genetic elements along with large genomic deletions.

    In this article, we describe the modification of a targeted codon in the human RPS6KA3 gene that encodes kinase RSK2, which is implicated in cancer, mental retardation, and psychomotor and skeletal disorders.

  • Methods

    Click Image To Enlarge +
    Figure 1. (A) A 125 mer oligo-donor designed to incorporate three desired mutations in the RSK2 locus. (B) Acrylamide gel separation of BamHI-digested K562 genomic DNA two days after transfection of oligos and ZFNs. The intensity of the BamHI bands relative to the parental PCR band is a measure of the mutation frequency in the pool of cells.

    Oligonucleotide and ZFN engineering: A ZFN that cuts 27 bp from the site of the desired codon change in the RSK2 locus was engineered by the CompoZr ZFN operations group at Sigma Life Science. All oligonucleotides were manufactured by Sigma Life Science and did not require chemical modifications to achieve efficient genome editing.

    A 125 mer RSK2 ssODN was designed that contained: (1) the codon change, a cysteine to valine switch in the ATP binding domain, (2) a silent cytosine to adenine mutation to create a BamHI restriction site to assist with genotyping during clonal isolation, (3) a ZFN blocking mutation (ZBM) to prevent re-cleaving of the modified locus post-integration of the ssODN-delivered sequence (Figure 1A).

    Cell culture and transfection: The human K562 cell line was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and grown in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s medium, supplemented with 10% FBS and 2 mM L-glutamine. K562 cultures were split one day before transfection and were at ~0.5 million cells mL-1 and nucleofected with Nucleofector Solution V (Lonza) using the T-016 program.

    Each K562 nucleofection contained 500,000 cells suspended in 100 µL of Nucleofector solution. The ssODN was dissolved in 10 mM Tris (pH 7.6) at 100 µM, and 1 or 3 µL of the stock solution was mixed with 4 or 8 µg of ZFN mRNA (2 or 4 µg of each ZFN mRNA). Cells were grown at 37°C and 5% CO2 immediately after nucleofection.

    Restriction fragment length polymorphism assay: To determine if ZFN editing was sufficient to begin single-cell cloning, genomic DNA was extracted from transfected cells two days after nucleofection. Genomic DNA was then PCR amplified with primers flanking the ssODN target region. For the RSK2 locus all amplicons were digested with BamHI and resolved on an acrylamide gel. The primers were designed to generate a 428 bp fragment.

    Cell cloning: For the codon conversion single-cell cloning was performed by limiting dilution. Cells were lysed and screened for targeted mutations by real-time PCR. Clones were screened with a BamHI site-specific forward primer and a wild-type specific forward primer in combination with a common reverse primer. Candidate clones were then screened for the biallelic cysteine to valine mutation with a mutation-specific forward primer and a wild-type specific forward primer in combination with the common reverse primer.



Related content

Jobs

GEN Jobs powered by HireLifeScience.com connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
 Searching...
More »

GEN Poll

More » Poll Results »

Ebola Vaccines

When do you think an Ebola vaccine will be available for the general public?