GEN Exclusives

More »

Tutorials

More »
Jul 1, 2011 (Vol. 31, No. 13)

Achieving Optimal Expression for Fabs

Using a Combinatorial Approach in a P. fluorescens System to Boost Production

  • Bioanalytical Assays

    This makes available a significant amount of expressed protein with which to perform bioanalytical assays even at this small scale. Typically, we perform a two-tiered assay scheme. Sample preparation is automated, with harvest, sonication, and separation of soluble and insoluble fractions performed on a single robotic platform.

    The first round of analysis is designed to provide information on the titer of active Fab expressed in the soluble fraction, using high-throughput, automated biolayer interferometry. Binding of assembled, active Fab to its antigen can be used to rank the expression strains, rapidly identifying the top yielding 1-5% of the expression strains evaluated. Alternately, binding to protein L or protein A can be used to quantitate soluble Fab.

    The scatter plot depicted in Figure 1 is an example of results from the first-tier analysis of a typical 1,000-strain screen. Both host strain and expression plasmid can influence the overall yield of active Fab.

    In this example, strains carrying monocistronic expression plasmids are shown in black and those carrying bicistronic expression plasmids are shown in red. The top yielding strains typically produce 100 to 500 mg/L of active Fab at the 96-well scale.

    The second tier of assays is performed on selected samples and can include affinity enrichment of active Fab, SDS-CGE, Western blot, and even LC-MS to further assess the quality of the expressed Fab. The ability to perform intact mass analyses at this scale can give us information on the fidelity of signal peptidase cleavage of the secretion leaders on both the heavy and light chains.

    All of these steps, from receipt of optimized gene fragments through completion of the analyses and selection of strains to evaluate in fermentation, take approximately five weeks to complete. In the case that the goal is the isolation of research amounts of protein, sufficient amounts of protein can be isolated from shake flask cultures due to the large amount of biomass (i.e., 30–50 A600 units) that can be recovered from such cultures.

    When larger quantities of material and/or an optimized production strain is the end goal, up to 10 high-yielding strains, representing a diversity of expression strategies and host strain combinations are selected for fermentation “range-finding” experiments to identify the most robust strain for further development.

  • Fermentation Conditions

    Click Image To Enlarge +
    Figure 3. Rapid transition from discovery to development for the production of Fab: In approximately 10 weeks from receipt of a synthetic gene fragment, significant amounts of preclinical material is provided.

    A design-of-experiments (DoE) approach is taken to first evaluate up to nine sets of experimental fermentation conditions at the 10 mL (4 mL working volume) microbioreactor scale. Variables such as temperature, pH, and inducer conditions are studied to identify robust strains and a range of effective conditions for high-level expression. Based on these results, two to three strains are studied in more conventional 1 L reactors to confirm the effectiveness of the conditions identified at the 4 mL scale.

    These two rounds of fermentation studies together are accomplished in about four weeks, and at this point in the screening process, strains and conditions producing over 1 g/L of active Fab have often been identified. The fermentation broth available from the 1 L reactors can be used to purify protein for further studies.

    Employing a combinatorial approach to strain engineering, we have shown that in little more than two months, 1,000 unique expression strains can be constructed, evaluated, a fermentation process partially developed, and an expression strain selected for further downstream development. This platform has delivered high-quality material for preclinical evaluation more rapidly than any other system, allowing for faster go/no-go decisions to be reached and thus minimizing opportunity costs associated with development.

    In several cases, expression of the same Fab in other systems such as yeast or E. coli failed to produce soluble, active Fab. An example is shown in Figure 3, where in about 10 weeks from receipt of the synthetic genes, this parallel screening approach enabled the production of 0.5 grams of >99% pure active Fab for preclinical studies, thus avoiding stalled development that would have occurred had Fab production been attempted in a less robust platform.



Related content

Jobs

GEN Jobs powered by HireLifeScience.com connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
 Searching...
More »

GEN Poll

More » Poll Results »

Block That Microbiome Metaphor!

Which way of thinking about the microbiome would best integrate the virome’s contributions?