GEN Exclusives

More »

Best Science Apps

More »
Jan 01, 2013 (Vol. 33, No. 1)

  • Wealth of information, great patient tools
  • None
Platform: iPad/iPhone  
Cost: Free

The Cancer.Net app is a fantastic example that showcases the transformative power of smart phones and tablets to medicine and, in particular, to doctor-patient interactions. Providing oncologist-approved information from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the Cancer.Net app is a comprehensive resource that provides background information on 120 different types of cancer, such as an overview, a section on risk factors and prevention, and information on treatment, side effects, and current research. However, beyond simply focusing on disease-centric background information, the majority of the app takes a patient-centric approach, providing information in categories such as newly diagnosed, managing side effects, and managing the cost of cancer care. There is an entire section devoted to aspects of coping, encompassing topics such as emotional and physical matters, relationships and cancer, and survivorship. Perhaps most useful, though, are the tools within the app to track one’s medications and symptoms, as well as to record questions for the doctor (and to record the doctor’s answers).

  • Key:
  • Strong Points
  • Weak Points
  • Ratings:
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good

*The opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s) and should not be construed as reflecting the viewpoints of the publisher, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., the publishing house, or employees and affiliates thereof.


GEN Jobs powered by connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
More »

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

The Triple Package and Success

One theory for explaining “success," put forward by Amy Chua Jed Rubenfeld, posits cultural traits such as a superiority complex, personal insecurity and impulse control. Union College professors Joshua Hart and Christopher Chabris counter that intelligence, conscientiousness, and economic advantage are the most likely elements of success, regardless of ethnicity. Do you think that Hart-Chabris make a better argument for achieving success than the Chua-Rubenfeld theory?

More »