GEN Exclusives

More »

Best of the Web

More »
Mar 15, 2007 (Vol. 27, No. 6)

The RNASociety WebSite
  • Links, newsletter
  • Needs to be more robust
I know I complain a lot about organization-based sites but keep including them in my listings anyway. Why, you may wonder. The answer is that the various professional organizations are noteworthy on their own merits, and if their sites have anything at all to offer to the general public, these two factors add up to justify reporting on them. The latest such site is that of the RNA Society, which for reasons I don’t understand, leaves out the space between ‘RNA’ and ‘Society’ in the site name but not in the name of the organization. Go figure. The RNA Society is dedicated to the sharing and dissemination of information relevant to RNA research. Like other sites for professional organizations, the RNASociety WebSite has its b-o-r-i-n-g elements, but it has several useful features as well. They include an excellent collection of links, a section on employment opportunities (only one position listed at press time, though), meeting information, and newsletters. Clearly a cut above the standard professional society website.
  • Key:
  • Strong Points
  • Weak Points
  • Ratings:
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good

*The opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s) and should not be construed as reflecting the viewpoints of the publisher, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., the publishing house, or employees and affiliates thereof.


GEN Jobs powered by connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
More »

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

The Triple Package and Success

One theory for explaining “success," put forward by Amy Chua Jed Rubenfeld, posits cultural traits such as a superiority complex, personal insecurity and impulse control. Union College professors Joshua Hart and Christopher Chabris counter that intelligence, conscientiousness, and economic advantage are the most likely elements of success, regardless of ethnicity. Do you think that Hart-Chabris make a better argument for achieving success than the Chua-Rubenfeld theory?

More »