GEN Exclusives

More »

Best of the Web

More »
Oct 15, 2007 (Vol. 27, No. 18)

  • Broad coverage
  • Nothing significant
I’m surprised with all the interest in proteomics and array technology that I haven’t seen more sites focusing more on proteomes. A rare exception is proteomicsSURF, which, as its name indicates, is devoted to proteomes and tissue-specific gene expression. Unlike other websites, which tend to focus on a single tissue or cell type corresponding to the research interest of the person organizing the site, proteomicsSURF provides information on a wide spectrum of cells. The opening page (at press time) focuses on the liver proteome, with an enormous collection of links relating to it. Sadly, the 2-D gel shown on the opening image is not used as a link to further information, at least as far as I could see. That is not to say, however, that there is not an ENORMOUS amount of information about liver proteins available. There is. Combine that with equivalent amounts of info about other tissues such as breast, cardiovascular, digestive system, hematology, urology, and many others, and you have the most prominent proteomics site on the Web. Kudos to the designers.
  • Key:
  • Strong Points
  • Weak Points
  • Ratings:
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good

*The opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s) and should not be construed as reflecting the viewpoints of the publisher, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., the publishing house, or employees and affiliates thereof.


GEN Jobs powered by connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
More »

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

The Triple Package and Success

One theory for explaining “success," put forward by Amy Chua Jed Rubenfeld, posits cultural traits such as a superiority complex, personal insecurity and impulse control. Union College professors Joshua Hart and Christopher Chabris counter that intelligence, conscientiousness, and economic advantage are the most likely elements of success, regardless of ethnicity. Do you think that Hart-Chabris make a better argument for achieving success than the Chua-Rubenfeld theory?

More »