GEN Exclusives

More »

Best of the Web

More »
Feb 15, 2007 (Vol. 27, No. 4)

Digital Morphology at the University of Texas
  • High quality images
  • Too little user control
Funded by the National Science Foundation and hosted at the University of Texas, Digital Morphology is a “dynamic archive of information on digital morphology and high-resolution X-ray computed tomography of biological specimens.” I couldn’t have said it better myself. The opening page gives a hint to the contents inside, with high-resolution images of a suckermouth, a cormorant, a kingsnake, and an orangutan. Clicking on an image brings up a page with links to numbered videos showing various rotations of the structure, as well as slices through the organism. The quality is outstanding, but I’m disappointed at the lack of ability for users to manipulate the images (for example, rotating them to a desired angle and freezing them at that angle). Granted, the movies provide virtually every conceivable angle, but user controls are essential for future versions.
  • Key:
  • Strong Points
  • Weak Points
  • Ratings:
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good

*The opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s) and should not be construed as reflecting the viewpoints of the publisher, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., the publishing house, or employees and affiliates thereof.


GEN Jobs powered by connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
More »

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

The Triple Package and Success

One theory for explaining “success," put forward by Amy Chua Jed Rubenfeld, posits cultural traits such as a superiority complex, personal insecurity and impulse control. Union College professors Joshua Hart and Christopher Chabris counter that intelligence, conscientiousness, and economic advantage are the most likely elements of success, regardless of ethnicity. Do you think that Hart-Chabris make a better argument for achieving success than the Chua-Rubenfeld theory?

More »