GEN Exclusives

More »

Best of the Web

More »
Jun 15, 2012 (Vol. 32, No. 12)
  • Many tutorials, downloadable content
  • One analysis tool not accessible

Just as genes interact in complex ways, so too do biological datasets. For example, say that “resource A” contains information about protein families, but “resource B” has a repository of protein structures. To the biologist who researches proteins, those separate resources would ideally be brought together under the same (online) roof. That is exactly what—a database developed by a lab at Cornell University and now based at Stanford University—offers. integrates information from a variety of databases and other sources to create a unified resource emphasizing DNA and protein classification and characterization. A schematic on the homepage provides an overview of the types of information included in the database. The eight categories are: protein families, domains, pathways, proteins, structures, interactions, nucleic acids, and Unigene cluster. In addition to the database itself, also includes a few analysis tools and some downloadable software and files.

  • Key:
  • Strong Points
  • Weak Points
  • Ratings:
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good

*The opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s) and should not be construed as reflecting the viewpoints of the publisher, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., the publishing house, or employees and affiliates thereof.


GEN Jobs powered by connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
More »

Be sure to take the GEN Poll

The Triple Package and Success

One theory for explaining “success," put forward by Amy Chua Jed Rubenfeld, posits cultural traits such as a superiority complex, personal insecurity and impulse control. Union College professors Joshua Hart and Christopher Chabris counter that intelligence, conscientiousness, and economic advantage are the most likely elements of success, regardless of ethnicity. Do you think that Hart-Chabris make a better argument for achieving success than the Chua-Rubenfeld theory?

More »