Current Issue

View Larger Image

Past Issues Free Subscriptions
Sponsored
Keywords



Best Of The Web

More »
Jun 15, 2006 (Vol. 26, No. 12)

Annual Bibliographies of Significant Advances in Dietary Supplement Research

ods.od.nih.gov/Research/Annual_Bibliographies.aspx
  • Excellent summaries
  • Nothing significant
I’m always a little cautious reporting on research relating to nutrition because there are so many claims made about supplements and nutrition products that aren’t exactly scientifically established. I figure this interesting set of pages from the NIH ought to be safe, though. In existence since 1999, the site is a simple one. On the opening page, one can click on any of the six annual bibliographic collections and download a PDF covering that year. What is awesome about Annual Bibliographies is the content of these PDFs. Inside each are a summary of every paper representing the 25 most significant findings in the field that year. What an excellent idea! The only question I have is why other disciplines haven’t done the same thing.
  • Key
  • Strong Points
  • Weak Points
  • Ratings
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good

*The opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s) and should not be construed as reflecting the viewpoints of the publisher, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., the publishing house, or employees and affiliates thereof.

GEN Poll

More » Poll Results » Archive »

Genome Sequencing and Patient Autonomy

Do you think ACMG’s recent recommendations for reporting incidental clinical sequencing results undermine patient autonomy?

Suggest a Poll